Portraiture Performance 1 - Rome 2024

2024 - Palazzo Velli - Trastevere, Rome, Italy - 4.5 hours

Gallery goers are welcome to sit at any point in time before me and my canvas to have their portrait added to the painting.

At no point in time do I as the artist interact with them, not telling them how to pose, where to look, or how long to stay. These choices are all up to the sitter. In this way, there is an exploration of the power held by model/muse/sitter and artist/painter.

What agency does the sitter hold? How is someone visually captured in shorter and longer time frames? What does the artist gain from the unpredictability of the start and end of any given portrait? What does the sitter?

In this first performance, I found that sitters didn’t quite understand that they choose when the painting is finished by sitting for a time of their choice, relying on me to tell them it is done. But this is also interesting! Do sitters inherently expect to be told by the artist when their portrait is finished, or is there a fear of inserting themselves during the painting process to the artist?

In future performances, I would like the guidelines of the performance to be more clear so that I may limit artist intervention. I’m curious how environment might impact this by having the painting area closed off from other inputs. Ideally, I would like the performance to ensue where the sitter and artist do not exchange a word, at least not until the sitter decides their portrait is finished.

I also wonder about varying the “control group” of sitters. How long would professional figure models sit? Or other figure painters? What about setting up the performance in a public space, opening the project to “non-arts” individuals?

Previous
Previous

On Transness and Bathrooms (Series)

Next
Next

Beach Feet (2023)